AI Agents

AI Agents

Complete Guide to Building Autonomous AI Systems

TL;DR

What is AI Agents?

AI agents are autonomous software systems that can think, plan, use tools, and take actions to complete tasks - not just chat. Unlike regular chatbots that only respond to questions, agents can actually DO things: call APIs, read files, search the web, and complete entire workflows on their own.

What Are AI Agents?

AI agents are autonomous software systems that can think, plan, and actually DO things - not just chat. Here's the thing: while a regular chatbot just answers our questions, an AI agent can go out, use tools, call APIs, read files, and complete entire tasks on its own.

Think of it like this: a chatbot is like texting a friend who gives advice. An AI agent is like hiring an assistant who actually does the work.

What makes AI agents special? They can:

  • Plan - Break down "build me a website" into actual steps
  • Execute - Use tools to actually do the work (not just tell us how)
  • Learn - Remember what worked and get better over time
  • Collaborate - Work with other agents or check in with us when needed

The key word is agency - the ability to independently decide what to do next. When we tell an agent "research competitors and create a report", it figures out HOW to do that and just... does it.

LLM vs AI Agent: Code Comparison

The best way to understand AI agents is to see the difference in actual code. Let's break this down with a real example.

Approach 1: Simple LLM Call

A standard LLM just generates text based on input - no actions, no tools, no memory. It's like asking someone who's locked in a room:

import openai

# Simple LLM - just generates text, no actions
def simple_llm_query(question: str) -> str:
    response = openai.chat.completions.create(
        model="gpt-4",
        messages=[
            {"role": "user", "content": question}
        ]
    )
    return response.choices[0].message.content

# Example: Ask about weather
result = simple_llm_query("What's the weather in Tel Aviv?")
print(result)
# Output: "I don't have access to real-time weather data..."
LLM Output:
"I don't have access to real-time weather data. As of my knowledge cutoff, Tel Aviv typically has Mediterranean climate with hot summers..."

See the problem? It can't actually check the weather - it can only tell us what it "knows".

Approach 2: AI Agent with Tools

An AI agent can use tools to actually GET real data and take actions. This changes everything:

from langchain.agents import initialize_agent, Tool
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
import requests

# Define tools the agent can use
def get_weather(city: str) -> str:
    # Actually fetch real weather data
    api_url = f"https://api.weather.com/{city}"
    response = requests.get(api_url)
    return response.json()["current"]

def send_notification(message: str) -> str:
    # Send actual notification
    # ... notification logic
    return f"Notification sent: {message}"

# Create tools list
tools = [
    Tool(
        name="Weather",
        func=get_weather,
        description="Get current weather for a city"
    ),
    Tool(
        name="Notify",
        func=send_notification,
        description="Send a notification message"
    )
]

# Initialize agent with tools
agent = initialize_agent(
    tools=tools,
    llm=OpenAI(model="gpt-4"),
    agent="zero-shot-react-description"
)

# Agent decides what to do and executes
result = agent.run(
    "Check the weather in Tel Aviv and notify me if it's above 30°C"
)
print(result)
Agent Output:
Thought: I need to check the weather in Tel Aviv first
Action: Weather("Tel Aviv")
Observation: {"temp": 32, "conditions": "sunny"}
Thought: Temperature is 32°C, above 30°C. I should notify the user.
Action: Notify("Alert: Tel Aviv is 32°C - above your 30°C threshold!")
Final: "I checked Tel Aviv weather (32°C, sunny) and sent you a notification since it's above 30°C."

The Key Differences

Simple LLM:
• Only generates text
• Can't access real-time data
• No ability to take actions
• Single request-response
AI Agent:
• Uses tools to get real data
• Takes actions in the world
• Reasons about what to do
• Multi-step execution loop

Bottom line: an LLM talks, an agent does.

How AI Agents Work

AI agents work through what we call an "agent loop" - a continuous cycle of thinking and doing. It's actually pretty elegant once we understand it.

The Agent Loop

Every AI agent follows this basic pattern:

  1. Observe - Get input (our request, API response, file contents)
  2. Think - Use the LLM to analyze the situation and plan next steps
  3. Act - Execute a tool, call an API, or generate output
  4. Reflect - Check if it worked, adjust if needed
  5. Repeat - Keep going until the goal is achieved

The exciting part is that step 2-4 happens automatically. We give it a goal, and it figures out the rest.

Core Components

Every agent has these building blocks:

  • LLM Brain - The reasoning engine (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini) - this is what "thinks"
  • Tools - APIs and functions the agent can call - these are its "hands"
  • Memory - Short-term (conversation) and long-term (vector database) - this is how it "remembers"
  • Planning Module - How it breaks down complex tasks - this is its "strategy"

Think of it like a person: brain to think, hands to do, memory to learn, and planning skills to tackle big projects.

Top AI Agent Frameworks (2026)

The ecosystem of AI agent frameworks has matured significantly. In my view, here are the leading options and when to use each:

LangChain / LangGraph

The most popular framework for building LLM applications. LangGraph adds stateful, multi-actor workflows on top.

  • Best for: Production applications, complex workflows
  • Pros: Mature ecosystem, extensive documentation, large community
  • Cons: Can be verbose, learning curve is steep

CrewAI

Focused on multi-agent collaboration with role-based agents working together. Think of it like assembling a team where each agent has a job title.

  • Best for: Team simulations, complex multi-step tasks
  • Pros: Intuitive role-based design, great for workflows
  • Cons: Less flexible for single-agent scenarios

AutoGPT / AgentGPT

Fully autonomous agents that can self-direct toward goals. Give it a mission and let it run.

  • Best for: Research, exploration, autonomous tasks
  • Pros: True autonomy, minimal human intervention needed
  • Cons: Can go off-track, resource intensive

Claude Code / Anthropic Agent SDK

Anthropic's agentic coding assistant and SDK for building Claude-powered agents. This is what I use daily.

  • Best for: Coding tasks, developer workflows
  • Pros: Excellent reasoning, safe by design, great tool use
  • Cons: Claude-specific (though that's not really a con in my view)

Bottom line? For production apps, start with LangChain. For multi-agent teams, use CrewAI. For coding, Claude Code is absolutely insane.

Building Our First AI Agent

Here's a practical roadmap to building our first AI agent. Let's break this down step by step.

Step 1: Define the Goal

Start with something specific and achievable. Don't try to build Jarvis on day one. Good starting points:

  • Research agent that summarizes articles on a topic
  • Code review agent that analyzes pull requests
  • Customer support agent that answers FAQs from our docs

Step 2: Choose Our Stack

  • LLM: Claude 3.5/4 (my recommendation), GPT-4, or open-source like Llama 3
  • Framework: LangChain for production, CrewAI for multi-agent
  • Memory: Pinecone, Chroma, or Weaviate for vector storage

Step 3: Design Our Tools

What actions should our agent be able to take? Common ones:

  • Web search (Tavily, SerpAPI)
  • File operations (read, write, edit)
  • API calls (custom integrations)
  • Code execution (sandboxed environments)

Step 4: Implement Safety Guards

This is critical - we don't want our agent going rogue:

  • Input validation - sanitize everything
  • Output filtering - no harmful content
  • Rate limiting - prevent runaway costs
  • Human-in-the-loop for critical actions - always ask before deleting prod data

Step 5: Test and Iterate

Start with simple test cases. If it can't handle "check the weather", don't give it access to our production database.

Practical Example: TypeScript Agent with Tool Use

Here's a real-world example using Anthropic's Claude with tool use. This is actual code we can run:

import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk";

// Define the tools our agent can use
const tools = [
  {
    name: "search_database",
    description: "Search the product database for items",
    input_schema: {
      type: "object",
      properties: {
        query: { type: "string", description: "Search query" },
        category: { type: "string", description: "Product category" }
      },
      required: ["query"]
    }
  },
  {
    name: "create_order",
    description: "Create an order for a product",
    input_schema: {
      type: "object",
      properties: {
        product_id: { type: "string" },
        quantity: { type: "number" }
      },
      required: ["product_id", "quantity"]
    }
  }
];

// Tool implementation
async function executeTool(name: string, input: any) {
  if (name === "search_database") {
    // Simulate database search
    return { products: [{ id: "SKU-001", name: "Widget Pro", price: 29.99 }] };
  }
  if (name === "create_order") {
    // Create actual order
    return { order_id: "ORD-12345", status: "confirmed" };
  }
}

// Agent loop - keeps running until task is complete
async function runAgent(userRequest: string) {
  const client = new Anthropic();
  const messages = [{ role: "user", content: userRequest }];

  while (true) {
    const response = await client.messages.create({
      model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
      max_tokens: 1024,
      tools: tools,
      messages: messages
    });

    // Check if agent wants to use a tool
    if (response.stop_reason === "tool_use") {
      for (const block of response.content) {
        if (block.type === "tool_use") {
          console.log(`Using tool: ${block.name}`);
          const result = await executeTool(block.name, block.input);

          // Add tool result back to conversation
          messages.push({ role: "assistant", content: response.content });
          messages.push({
            role: "user",
            content: [{ type: "tool_result", tool_use_id: block.id, content: JSON.stringify(result) }]
          });
        }
      }
    } else {
      // Agent is done - return final response
      return response.content[0].text;
    }
  }
}

// Run the agent
const result = await runAgent("Find a Widget Pro and order 2 of them");
console.log(result);
Agent Execution Flow:

Using tool: search_database
Using tool: create_order

Final Response: "I found Widget Pro (SKU-001) at $29.99 and successfully created order ORD-12345 for 2 units. Your total is $59.98."

The exciting part? This is the entire agent. The LLM decides when to use which tool, and the loop keeps going until the task is done.

Multi-Agent Systems

Multi-agent systems combine multiple specialized agents to tackle complex problems. It's like building a team where each member has a specific role - and turns out, this approach works incredibly well.

Common Patterns

1. Hierarchical (Manager-Worker)

A manager agent delegates tasks to specialized worker agents. Think project manager with a team.

  • Manager: Plans and coordinates the overall strategy
  • Workers: Execute specific tasks (research, coding, writing)

2. Collaborative (Peer-to-Peer)

Equal agents that pass work between each other in a pipeline.

  • Writer → Editor → Fact-Checker → Publisher

3. Competitive (Debate)

Agents argue different perspectives to reach better conclusions. This is fascinating - we get better answers when agents challenge each other.

  • Great for decision-making and validation

Real-World Applications

  • AI Hedge Funds: Analyst, Risk Manager, and Trader agents working together
  • Content Pipelines: Researcher, Writer, Editor, and SEO agents in sequence
  • Software Development: Architect, Developer, Tester, and Reviewer agents collaborating

In my experience, the hierarchical pattern is easiest to start with. Once we're comfortable, the peer-to-peer pipeline is incredibly powerful for content and data processing.

Agent Memory Systems

Memory is what separates simple chatbots from true AI agents. Without memory, every conversation starts from zero. With effective memory, our agents learn, recall context, and improve over time.

Types of Agent Memory

Short-Term Memory

The current conversation context - basically what's in the prompt right now.

  • Limited by context window size (128K tokens for Claude, varies for others)
  • Lost after session ends
  • Perfect for immediate task context

Long-Term Memory

Persistent storage using vector databases - this is where the magic happens.

  • Survives across sessions - the agent "remembers" us
  • Semantic search retrieval - finds relevant info by meaning, not just keywords
  • Popular solutions: Pinecone (managed), Chroma (open-source), Weaviate

Episodic Memory

Records of specific events and interactions. Think of it as the agent's diary.

  • What happened, when, with whom
  • Useful for learning from past experiences
  • "Last time we tried this approach, it didn't work because..."

Procedural Memory

Learned skills and workflows - how to do things.

  • How to perform specific tasks
  • Can be updated as agent learns new techniques
  • "When deploying to production, first run tests, then..."

Implementation Tips

  • Use embeddings to store semantic meaning (OpenAI ada-002, Cohere)
  • Implement relevance scoring for retrieval - not all memories are equally useful
  • Consider memory summarization for efficiency - compress old memories
  • Add timestamps for temporal context - recent info is often more relevant

In my experience, starting with simple long-term memory using a vector DB gives us 80% of the benefit with 20% of the complexity.

Recommended Tools

LangChain

The most popular framework for building LLM applications - great ecosystem and docs

Framework

LangGraph

Stateful multi-actor workflows on top of LangChain

Framework

CrewAI

Multi-agent framework for collaborative AI teams - intuitive role-based design

Framework

AutoGPT

Fully autonomous GPT-4 powered agent - give it a goal and let it run

Agent

Claude Code

Anthropic's agentic coding assistant - absolutely insane for dev work

Tool

Pinecone

Managed vector database for agent memory - easy to scale

Memory

Chroma

Open-source embedding database - great for local development

Memory

Tavily

AI-optimized web search API - built for agents

Tool

Frequently Asked Questions

A chatbot responds to our questions - it's reactive. An AI agent can plan, use tools, and take autonomous actions to achieve goals. Think of it this way: a chatbot tells us how to book a flight, an agent actually books it.
For production apps, LangChain/LangGraph is the most mature. For multi-agent teams, CrewAI is excellent. For coding tasks, Claude Code or the Anthropic Agent SDK are my top picks. Start simple - we can always switch later.
Yes, with proper safeguards: input validation, output filtering, rate limiting, sandboxed execution, and human-in-the-loop for critical actions. The key is starting with limited scope and expanding gradually.
AI agents improve through: long-term memory storing successful patterns, feedback loops from us (the users), self-reflection on task outcomes, and optionally fine-tuning on domain-specific data.
Absolutely! Multi-agent systems combine specialized agents (researcher, writer, reviewer) that collaborate on complex tasks. Frameworks like CrewAI are designed specifically for this. In my experience, agent teams often outperform single agents on complex tasks.
Costs depend on LLM API usage (tokens processed), vector database storage, and compute for tool execution. To optimize: use smaller models for simple tasks, cache responses, limit agent loops, and set budget caps.

Related Articles

Comments